+95.9%
W vs MSTZ
-99.3%
+195.2%
-57.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | MSTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.5% | +2.6% | -0.1% | +2.8% |
| 7D | -4.2% | -29.7% | +25.5% | -7.1% |
| 30D | -7.6% | -65.3% | +57.7% | -16.5% |
| 3M | +37.2% | -57.3% | +94.5% | +31.0% |
| 6M | +26.3% | -61.6% | +88.0% | +22.8% |
| YTD | -1.0% | -78.3% | +77.3% | -4.8% |
| 1Y | +20.1% | -30.2% | +50.3% | +38.9% |
| All | +95.9% | -99.3% | +195.2% | +62.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MSTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MSTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MSTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MSTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling