+47.0%
VZ vs UMAC
+494.0%
-447.0%
-17.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | -3.1% | +2.2% | -0.9% |
| 7D | +0.1% | -0.9% | +1.0% | +0.1% |
| 30D | +7.9% | -7.7% | +15.6% | +7.9% |
| 3M | +13.6% | -26.4% | +40.1% | +13.8% |
| 6M | +1.1% | +61.9% | -60.8% | +1.5% |
| YTD | +29.3% | +86.5% | -57.2% | +29.8% |
| 1Y | +21.2% | +156.3% | -135.1% | +21.8% |
| All | +47.0% | +494.0% | -447.0% | +46.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling