+57.3%
VZ vs LDOS
+35.4%
+22.0%
-17.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.1% | +0.1% | -0.2% | -0.1% |
| 7D | +5.6% | -3.7% | +9.3% | +5.8% |
| 30D | +1.9% | +16.4% | -14.5% | +1.3% |
| 3M | +0.8% | +7.4% | -6.6% | +0.5% |
| 6M | +0.6% | -0.3% | +1.0% | 0.0% |
| YTD | +20.8% | -24.0% | +44.8% | +19.7% |
| 1Y | +23.9% | -29.6% | +53.5% | +23.2% |
| All | +57.3% | +35.4% | +22.0% | +58.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling