+55.9%
VZ vs ECHO
+621.2%
-565.3%
-17.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ECHO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | -4.1% | +3.0% | -1.1% |
| 7D | +2.1% | -2.4% | +4.5% | +2.1% |
| 30D | +1.4% | -3.1% | +4.5% | +1.4% |
| 3M | -1.3% | +8.7% | -10.0% | -1.1% |
| 6M | -0.5% | -24.8% | +24.2% | -0.6% |
| YTD | +19.6% | -13.0% | +32.6% | +19.7% |
| 1Y | +22.4% | +33.9% | -11.6% | +22.5% |
| 3Y | +55.9% | +791.8% | -735.9% | +52.4% |
| All | +55.9% | +621.2% | -565.3% | +52.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ECHO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ECHO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ECHO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ECHO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling