+85.1%
VWO vs GLDM
+248.1%
-163.1%
-34.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.7% | -0.9% | +1.6% | +1.0% |
| 7D | +1.1% | -0.5% | +1.6% | +1.2% |
| 30D | +2.4% | +4.4% | -2.0% | +1.0% |
| 3M | +2.0% | -1.1% | +3.1% | +2.1% |
| 6M | +10.7% | -13.7% | +24.3% | +14.9% |
| YTD | +14.4% | +2.8% | +11.7% | +12.8% |
| 1Y | +22.7% | +24.8% | -2.1% | +14.2% |
| 3Y | +64.2% | +127.8% | -63.6% | +27.8% |
| 5Y | +35.8% | +141.1% | -105.4% | +3.0% |
| All | +85.1% | +248.1% | -163.1% | +33.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling