+373.4%
VST vs ZETA
+311.4%
+62.0%
-48.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZETA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.5% | -4.1% | +7.6% | +4.1% |
| 7D | +8.9% | +2.7% | +6.3% | +8.3% |
| 30D | +6.2% | +15.8% | -9.6% | +3.5% |
| 3M | -2.7% | +35.4% | -38.1% | -8.1% |
| 6M | -8.4% | +67.1% | -75.5% | -17.5% |
| YTD | -7.2% | +54.1% | -61.3% | -15.6% |
| 1Y | -20.9% | +67.8% | -88.7% | -29.8% |
| All | +373.4% | +311.4% | +62.0% | +293.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZETA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZETA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZETA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZETA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling