+227.8%
VST vs ZETA
+254.2%
-26.4%
-48.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZETA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -6.2% | -7.3% | +1.1% | -5.0% |
| 7D | -19.9% | -10.0% | -9.9% | -18.6% |
| 30D | -29.7% | -10.6% | -19.1% | -28.4% |
| 3M | -19.6% | +8.9% | -28.4% | -20.9% |
| 6M | -29.4% | +65.1% | -94.5% | -36.3% |
| YTD | -29.7% | +44.8% | -74.5% | -35.7% |
| 1Y | -40.0% | +47.8% | -87.8% | -45.5% |
| All | +227.8% | +254.2% | -26.4% | +170.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZETA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZETA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZETA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZETA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling