+28.9%
VRTX vs UMAC
+182.0%
-153.1%
-29.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.7% | -4.6% | +3.9% | -0.7% |
| 7D | -1.6% | -5.2% | +3.7% | -1.5% |
| 30D | +8.0% | -36.4% | +44.4% | +8.4% |
| 3M | +4.3% | -58.6% | +62.9% | +4.9% |
| 6M | +18.9% | -24.6% | +43.5% | +18.5% |
| YTD | +18.8% | -11.5% | +30.3% | +17.8% |
| 1Y | +24.0% | +16.9% | +7.1% | +22.4% |
| All | +28.9% | +182.0% | -153.1% | +19.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling