+619.5%
VRT vs GLDM
+128.8%
+490.8%
-61.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.4% | -0.9% | +5.2% | +4.6% |
| 7D | +9.1% | -0.5% | +9.7% | +9.3% |
| 30D | +0.9% | +4.4% | -3.5% | -0.5% |
| 3M | -13.4% | -1.1% | -12.3% | -13.3% |
| 6M | +11.7% | -13.7% | +25.4% | +15.2% |
| YTD | +73.2% | +2.8% | +70.5% | +77.2% |
| 1Y | +123.4% | +24.8% | +98.6% | +129.2% |
| All | +619.5% | +128.8% | +490.8% | +702.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling