+78.1%
VOO vs ZTS
-48.0%
+126.1%
-18.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZTS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.4% | +1.0% | -1.4% | -0.5% |
| 7D | +2.6% | +5.6% | -3.0% | +1.7% |
| 30D | -2.0% | +12.1% | -14.1% | -3.6% |
| 3M | -2.8% | +11.3% | -14.0% | -4.4% |
| 6M | +2.2% | +14.3% | -12.1% | -0.2% |
| YTD | +11.5% | -31.9% | +43.4% | +19.1% |
| 1Y | +13.5% | -29.3% | +42.8% | +20.1% |
| 3Y | +78.1% | -48.0% | +126.1% | +99.6% |
| All | +78.1% | -48.0% | +126.1% | +99.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZTS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZTS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZTS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZTS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling