+78.1%
VOO vs LSCC
+99.6%
-21.5%
-18.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LSCC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.4% | -5.5% | +5.1% | +0.5% |
| 7D | +2.6% | +7.0% | -4.4% | +1.3% |
| 30D | -2.0% | -2.3% | +0.3% | -2.1% |
| 3M | -2.8% | -12.5% | +9.8% | -1.5% |
| 6M | +2.2% | -10.6% | +12.8% | +2.0% |
| YTD | +11.5% | +52.7% | -41.2% | +0.2% |
| 1Y | +13.5% | +74.0% | -60.5% | -0.6% |
| 3Y | +78.1% | +104.8% | -26.7% | +43.9% |
| All | +78.1% | +99.6% | -21.5% | +43.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LSCC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LSCC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LSCC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LSCC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling