+203.1%
VLO vs USB
+90.4%
+112.7%
-41.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | USB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.9% | -2.1% | -1.8% | -3.1% |
| 7D | -8.7% | -1.5% | -7.2% | -8.3% |
| 30D | -16.2% | +4.3% | -20.5% | -17.7% |
| 3M | +16.2% | -6.1% | +22.2% | +18.6% |
| 6M | +39.8% | +9.4% | +30.4% | +33.4% |
| YTD | +119.0% | +15.2% | +103.8% | +102.7% |
| 1Y | +110.8% | +32.8% | +78.1% | +81.7% |
| All | +203.1% | +90.4% | +112.7% | +123.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside USB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus USB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × USB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded USB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling