+193.8%
VLO vs MTZ
+160.8%
+33.1%
-41.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | MTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.6% | -2.2% | +3.8% | +1.8% |
| 7D | +6.2% | +2.3% | +4.0% | +6.0% |
| 30D | +23.5% | -10.3% | +33.8% | +24.7% |
| 3M | +53.9% | -31.8% | +85.7% | +58.6% |
| 6M | +81.7% | -19.2% | +100.8% | +82.0% |
| YTD | +142.5% | +10.7% | +131.7% | +132.1% |
| 1Y | +145.4% | +37.5% | +107.9% | +127.1% |
| All | +193.8% | +160.8% | +33.1% | +138.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling