+202.4%
VLO vs HTZ
-86.4%
+288.9%
-41.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | +1.3% | -1.3% | 0.0% |
| 7D | +5.2% | +7.5% | -2.3% | +5.0% |
| 30D | +22.6% | +47.4% | -24.8% | +20.6% |
| 3M | +43.8% | -54.9% | +98.7% | +47.1% |
| 6M | +65.7% | -47.0% | +112.7% | +66.8% |
| YTD | +131.1% | -55.3% | +186.4% | +134.5% |
| 1Y | +143.6% | -57.6% | +201.3% | +146.1% |
| All | +202.4% | -86.4% | +288.9% | +239.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling