-100.0%
VIVK vs NIO
-53.2%
-46.8%
-100.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -9.6% | -5.9% | -3.7% | -7.2% |
| 7D | -38.6% | -4.7% | -34.0% | -36.7% |
| 30D | -87.7% | -14.3% | -73.4% | -86.9% |
| 3M | -98.9% | -32.8% | -66.0% | -98.7% |
| 6M | -100.0% | -49.8% | -50.1% | -99.9% |
| YTD | -100.0% | -40.2% | -59.8% | -100.0% |
| 1Y | -100.0% | -52.7% | -47.3% | -100.0% |
| All | -100.0% | -53.2% | -46.8% | -100.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling