+225.9%
VIK vs ULTA
+34.4%
+191.5%
-35.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | ULTA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.4% | -1.3% | -2.1% | -3.0% |
| 7D | -0.8% | -1.8% | +1.0% | -0.3% |
| 30D | -18.0% | -1.2% | -16.8% | -17.9% |
| 3M | -5.8% | +13.4% | -19.2% | -10.0% |
| 6M | +17.2% | -15.6% | +32.8% | +22.4% |
| YTD | +19.1% | -10.4% | +29.6% | +21.7% |
| 1Y | +33.6% | +5.5% | +28.2% | +27.9% |
| All | +225.9% | +34.4% | +191.5% | +174.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ULTA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ULTA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ULTA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ULTA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling