+90.6%
VGT vs UMAC
+473.8%
-383.1%
-27.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.2% | -2.5% | +3.7% | +1.3% |
| 7D | -0.2% | -3.4% | +3.2% | -0.1% |
| 30D | -0.4% | -15.1% | +14.7% | 0.0% |
| 3M | +4.4% | -10.8% | +15.2% | +4.2% |
| 6M | +32.1% | +15.7% | +16.4% | +29.1% |
| YTD | +28.8% | +80.1% | -51.4% | +23.6% |
| 1Y | +35.3% | +116.7% | -81.4% | +28.6% |
| All | +90.6% | +473.8% | -383.1% | +76.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling