+75.4%
VEA vs ZCMD
-100.0%
+175.4%
-13.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZCMD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.1% | -7.1% | +8.1% | +1.1% |
| 7D | -1.5% | -5.4% | +4.0% | -1.4% |
| 30D | -0.8% | -24.8% | +24.0% | -0.7% |
| 3M | +2.5% | -62.8% | +65.3% | +2.0% |
| 6M | +11.1% | -99.5% | +110.7% | +12.5% |
| YTD | +17.2% | -99.8% | +116.9% | +19.0% |
| 1Y | +24.5% | -99.9% | +124.4% | +26.9% |
| 3Y | +75.4% | -100.0% | +175.4% | +75.6% |
| All | +75.4% | -100.0% | +175.4% | +75.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZCMD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZCMD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZCMD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZCMD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling