+29.2%
VCIT vs NIO
-36.7%
+65.9%
-20.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | -1.6% | +1.5% | 0.0% |
| 7D | -0.3% | -13.0% | +12.7% | -0.2% |
| 30D | -0.8% | -18.3% | +17.5% | -0.5% |
| 3M | -1.0% | -33.2% | +32.2% | -0.6% |
| 6M | -1.8% | -21.5% | +19.6% | -1.7% |
| YTD | -0.7% | -25.5% | +24.8% | -0.5% |
| 1Y | +1.0% | -38.0% | +39.0% | +1.4% |
| 3Y | +18.8% | -65.5% | +84.3% | +19.4% |
| 5Y | +3.5% | -90.6% | +94.1% | +4.4% |
| All | +29.2% | -36.7% | +65.9% | +28.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling