+162.8%
USFD vs ABCL
+104.5%
+58.3%
-21.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ABCL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.4% | -1.2% | +0.9% | -0.3% |
| 7D | -3.0% | +0.7% | -3.7% | -3.0% |
| 30D | +3.5% | +93.1% | -89.5% | +0.6% |
| 3M | +26.6% | +79.4% | -52.9% | +23.3% |
| 6M | +11.7% | +214.9% | -203.2% | +6.0% |
| YTD | +38.1% | +234.2% | -196.1% | +30.2% |
| 1Y | +33.4% | +174.8% | -141.4% | +26.1% |
| All | +162.8% | +104.5% | +58.3% | +145.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ABCL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ABCL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ABCL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ABCL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling