+66.9%
USB vs ZM
+55.9%
+11.0%
-52.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | ZM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.3% | +3.3% | -3.5% | -0.3% |
| 7D | +1.4% | +2.9% | -1.5% | +1.4% |
| 30D | -1.3% | +0.7% | -2.0% | -1.3% |
| 3M | +15.2% | -3.7% | +18.9% | +15.3% |
| 6M | +18.8% | +29.9% | -11.0% | +18.2% |
| YTD | +21.0% | +17.4% | +3.6% | +20.5% |
| 1Y | +34.0% | +22.4% | +11.6% | +33.3% |
| 3Y | +95.3% | +41.3% | +54.0% | +93.7% |
| 5Y | +40.4% | -66.0% | +106.4% | +24.6% |
| All | +66.9% | +55.9% | +11.0% | +59.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling