+98.3%
USB vs TXT
+1.6%
+96.6%
-30.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | TXT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.3% | -0.4% | +0.1% | -0.1% |
| 7D | +1.4% | -4.8% | +6.2% | +4.0% |
| 30D | -1.3% | -10.6% | +9.3% | +4.5% |
| 3M | +15.2% | -13.2% | +28.4% | +23.0% |
| 6M | +18.8% | -20.3% | +39.2% | +32.7% |
| YTD | +21.0% | -9.3% | +30.3% | +24.6% |
| 1Y | +34.0% | -2.7% | +36.7% | +31.7% |
| All | +98.3% | +1.6% | +96.6% | +80.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TXT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TXT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TXT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TXT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling