+98.3%
USB vs TSLQ
-95.6%
+193.9%
-30.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | TSLQ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.3% | +12.0% | -12.2% | +0.8% |
| 7D | +1.4% | -5.8% | +7.2% | +1.1% |
| 30D | -1.3% | -22.1% | +20.8% | -3.1% |
| 3M | +15.2% | +10.1% | +5.2% | +17.9% |
| 6M | +18.8% | -6.8% | +25.6% | +20.7% |
| YTD | +21.0% | +8.5% | +12.5% | +25.1% |
| 1Y | +34.0% | -49.7% | +83.7% | +30.2% |
| All | +98.3% | -95.6% | +193.9% | +83.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TSLQ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TSLQ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TSLQ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TSLQ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling