+98.3%
USB vs QID
-73.9%
+172.1%
-30.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | QID | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.3% | -0.4% | +0.1% | -0.3% |
| 7D | +1.4% | -0.6% | +2.1% | +1.3% |
| 30D | -1.3% | 0.0% | -1.3% | -1.2% |
| 3M | +15.2% | +3.7% | +11.5% | +17.4% |
| 6M | +18.8% | -29.9% | +48.7% | +7.4% |
| YTD | +21.0% | -28.8% | +49.8% | +10.2% |
| 1Y | +34.0% | -37.2% | +71.2% | +17.7% |
| All | +98.3% | -73.9% | +172.1% | +33.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside QID.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus QID return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × QID return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded QID wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling