+98.3%
USB vs LSCC
+20.0%
+78.2%
-30.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LSCC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.3% | +2.0% | -2.2% | -0.6% |
| 7D | +1.4% | +1.3% | +0.1% | +1.2% |
| 30D | -1.3% | -9.7% | +8.4% | +0.3% |
| 3M | +15.2% | -23.7% | +39.0% | +19.3% |
| 6M | +18.8% | +26.5% | -7.7% | +10.6% |
| YTD | +21.0% | +57.5% | -36.5% | +6.8% |
| 1Y | +34.0% | +75.7% | -41.7% | +14.8% |
| All | +98.3% | +20.0% | +78.2% | +66.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LSCC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LSCC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LSCC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LSCC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling