+28.4%
USB vs GFS
-3.7%
+32.1%
-52.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | GFS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.3% | +1.5% | -1.8% | -0.5% |
| 7D | +1.4% | +1.0% | +0.4% | +1.3% |
| 30D | -1.3% | -8.6% | +7.3% | 0.0% |
| 3M | +15.2% | -46.5% | +61.8% | +27.6% |
| 6M | +18.8% | -4.8% | +23.7% | +15.4% |
| YTD | +21.0% | +29.7% | -8.6% | +8.7% |
| 1Y | +34.0% | +35.8% | -1.8% | +18.6% |
| 3Y | +95.3% | -18.3% | +113.7% | +86.7% |
| All | +28.4% | -3.7% | +32.1% | +20.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GFS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GFS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GFS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GFS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling