+98.3%
USB vs EPAM
-54.6%
+152.8%
-30.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.3% | -2.4% | +2.1% | +0.2% |
| 7D | +1.4% | +2.0% | -0.5% | +1.0% |
| 30D | -1.3% | +6.5% | -7.8% | -3.0% |
| 3M | +15.2% | +19.9% | -4.7% | +9.8% |
| 6M | +18.8% | -16.9% | +35.8% | +22.8% |
| YTD | +21.0% | -42.9% | +63.9% | +35.6% |
| 1Y | +34.0% | -30.4% | +64.4% | +41.7% |
| All | +98.3% | -54.6% | +152.8% | +108.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling