+98.3%
USB vs ENTG
+37.4%
+60.9%
-30.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ENTG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.3% | +6.2% | -6.4% | -1.3% |
| 7D | +1.4% | +2.8% | -1.4% | +0.9% |
| 30D | -1.3% | -4.7% | +3.4% | -0.8% |
| 3M | +15.2% | -0.7% | +16.0% | +12.2% |
| 6M | +18.8% | +7.7% | +11.1% | +12.4% |
| YTD | +21.0% | +65.1% | -44.1% | +2.4% |
| 1Y | +34.0% | +74.8% | -40.8% | +10.2% |
| All | +98.3% | +37.4% | +60.9% | +57.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ENTG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ENTG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ENTG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ENTG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling