+92.5%
USB vs DXCM
-13.6%
+106.1%
-30.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | DXCM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.1% | -4.5% | +2.4% | -1.6% |
| 7D | -1.5% | +5.7% | -7.1% | -2.1% |
| 30D | +4.3% | +1.3% | +3.0% | +4.1% |
| 3M | -6.1% | +2.2% | -8.3% | -6.4% |
| 6M | +9.4% | +42.0% | -32.6% | +4.4% |
| YTD | +15.2% | +27.3% | -12.1% | +11.3% |
| 1Y | +32.8% | +42.5% | -9.7% | +26.6% |
| All | +92.5% | -13.6% | +106.1% | +72.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DXCM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DXCM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DXCM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DXCM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling