+98.3%
USB vs CG
+58.1%
+40.2%
-30.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | CG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.3% | -1.6% | +1.4% | +0.4% |
| 7D | +1.4% | -4.3% | +5.8% | +3.3% |
| 30D | -1.3% | -5.1% | +3.8% | +0.6% |
| 3M | +15.2% | +8.7% | +6.6% | +10.2% |
| 6M | +18.8% | -9.2% | +28.1% | +22.5% |
| YTD | +21.0% | -18.9% | +39.9% | +30.4% |
| 1Y | +34.0% | -25.6% | +59.7% | +49.5% |
| All | +98.3% | +58.1% | +40.2% | +35.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling