+26.2%
UPS vs FANG
+52.7%
-26.4%
-19.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | FANG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.3% | -0.2% | +0.5% | +0.3% |
| 7D | -2.0% | +2.9% | -4.9% | -1.7% |
| 30D | -2.0% | +2.6% | -4.6% | -1.7% |
| 3M | -6.2% | +7.6% | -13.8% | -5.7% |
| 6M | +2.8% | +17.3% | -14.5% | +2.8% |
| YTD | +5.9% | +38.7% | -32.8% | +4.9% |
| 1Y | +26.2% | +51.6% | -25.4% | +23.4% |
| All | +26.2% | +52.7% | -26.4% | +23.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FANG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FANG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FANG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FANG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling