-25.9%
UPS vs ACGL
+34.2%
-60.2%
-44.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ACGL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.2% | -1.7% | +0.6% | -1.0% |
| 7D | -2.9% | -0.7% | -2.1% | -2.8% |
| 30D | -3.5% | -1.0% | -2.5% | -3.4% |
| 3M | -5.7% | +11.0% | -16.8% | -7.0% |
| 6M | -4.4% | -0.3% | -4.0% | -4.5% |
| YTD | +8.0% | +2.3% | +5.7% | +7.5% |
| 1Y | +29.0% | +6.4% | +22.7% | +27.8% |
| All | -25.9% | +34.2% | -60.2% | -27.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACGL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACGL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACGL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACGL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling