+231.9%
UPRO vs NIO
-55.4%
+287.3%
-48.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.9% | -1.2% | +5.1% | +4.1% |
| 7D | -3.8% | -1.8% | -2.0% | -3.4% |
| 30D | -8.9% | -6.6% | -2.2% | -7.6% |
| 3M | -7.4% | -29.9% | +22.4% | -1.5% |
| 6M | +1.6% | -46.6% | +48.2% | +12.9% |
| YTD | +23.2% | -36.5% | +59.6% | +32.0% |
| 1Y | +21.2% | -51.1% | +72.4% | +35.6% |
| All | +231.9% | -55.4% | +287.3% | +250.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling