+34.4%
UNP vs UMAC
+129.0%
-94.6%
-12.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.5% | -2.5% | +2.0% | -0.5% |
| 7D | -1.8% | -3.4% | +1.6% | -1.9% |
| 30D | -2.7% | -15.1% | +12.4% | -3.0% |
| 3M | +6.5% | -10.8% | +17.3% | +6.7% |
| 6M | +14.4% | +15.7% | -1.3% | +15.5% |
| YTD | +24.8% | +80.1% | -55.3% | +25.5% |
| 1Y | +34.4% | +116.7% | -82.3% | +35.1% |
| All | +34.4% | +129.0% | -94.6% | +35.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling