+46.9%
UNP vs FROG
+206.6%
-159.7%
-17.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FROG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.2% | -3.3% | +3.5% | +0.3% |
| 7D | -5.3% | -11.3% | +5.9% | -5.0% |
| 30D | -1.5% | +3.6% | -5.2% | -1.7% |
| 3M | +10.3% | +1.7% | +8.6% | +10.0% |
| 6M | +9.7% | +123.5% | -113.9% | +5.4% |
| YTD | +27.1% | +40.2% | -13.2% | +25.0% |
| 1Y | +32.6% | +81.0% | -48.4% | +27.2% |
| All | +46.9% | +206.6% | -159.7% | +28.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FROG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FROG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FROG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FROG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling