+9.7%
UNP vs ACM
-30.5%
+40.2%
-12.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | ACM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.2% | -0.4% | +0.5% | +0.2% |
| 7D | -5.3% | -3.7% | -1.6% | -5.2% |
| 30D | -1.5% | -11.1% | +9.6% | -1.4% |
| 3M | +10.3% | -8.0% | +18.2% | +10.2% |
| 6M | +9.7% | -29.7% | +39.3% | +13.1% |
| All | +9.7% | -30.5% | +40.2% | +13.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling