+240.3%
UMC vs NXT
+23.4%
+216.9%
-37.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NXT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.4% | +1.9% | +0.5% | +1.9% |
| 7D | +9.0% | -1.9% | +10.9% | +9.4% |
| 30D | +17.2% | -20.0% | +37.3% | +22.9% |
| 3M | +11.4% | -30.7% | +42.1% | +19.4% |
| 6M | +137.5% | -29.0% | +166.5% | +154.1% |
| YTD | +193.1% | -4.8% | +198.0% | +209.4% |
| 1Y | +240.3% | +22.8% | +217.5% | +261.0% |
| All | +240.3% | +23.4% | +216.9% | +261.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NXT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NXT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NXT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NXT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling