+262.2%
UMC vs NVT
+190.9%
+71.3%
-37.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NVT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.4% | +4.6% | -2.3% | +0.6% |
| 7D | +9.0% | +4.1% | +4.9% | +7.3% |
| 30D | +17.2% | -5.1% | +22.4% | +19.4% |
| 3M | +11.4% | -1.2% | +12.6% | +12.2% |
| 6M | +137.5% | +46.6% | +90.9% | +113.4% |
| YTD | +193.1% | +60.0% | +133.1% | +156.1% |
| 1Y | +240.3% | +70.8% | +169.5% | +190.3% |
| 3Y | +262.2% | +187.5% | +74.6% | +142.9% |
| All | +262.2% | +190.9% | +71.3% | +142.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NVT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NVT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NVT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NVT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling