+144.1%
UMC vs NI
+96.9%
+47.2%
-54.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | NI | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.4% | 0.0% | +2.4% | +2.4% |
| 7D | +9.0% | 0.0% | +9.0% | +9.0% |
| 30D | +17.2% | -1.4% | +18.6% | +17.4% |
| 3M | +11.4% | -10.6% | +22.0% | +12.8% |
| 6M | +137.5% | -9.3% | +146.8% | +139.7% |
| YTD | +193.1% | +1.1% | +192.0% | +191.0% |
| 1Y | +240.3% | +3.4% | +236.9% | +236.7% |
| 3Y | +262.2% | +67.9% | +194.3% | +229.9% |
| All | +144.1% | +96.9% | +47.2% | +144.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NI.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NI return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NI return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NI wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling