+262.2%
UMC vs LNG
+74.6%
+187.6%
-37.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LNG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.4% | +0.2% | +2.2% | +2.4% |
| 7D | +9.0% | -4.7% | +13.7% | +8.9% |
| 30D | +17.2% | +3.8% | +13.4% | +17.2% |
| 3M | +11.4% | +16.2% | -4.8% | +11.3% |
| 6M | +137.5% | +11.7% | +125.8% | +135.6% |
| YTD | +193.1% | +44.2% | +148.9% | +176.9% |
| 1Y | +240.3% | +18.6% | +221.7% | +235.8% |
| 3Y | +262.2% | +77.4% | +184.8% | +225.8% |
| All | +262.2% | +74.6% | +187.6% | +225.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LNG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LNG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LNG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LNG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling