+108.2%
UMC vs FN
+101.0%
+7.2%
-51.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.5% | +11.7% | -8.1% | +0.5% |
| 7D | -17.0% | 0.0% | -16.9% | -17.0% |
| 30D | -40.6% | -34.3% | -6.3% | -34.5% |
| 3M | -27.9% | -39.9% | +12.0% | -19.5% |
| 6M | -7.5% | -51.8% | +44.4% | +6.8% |
| YTD | +79.3% | -28.1% | +107.5% | +88.5% |
| 1Y | +92.8% | -29.1% | +121.9% | +101.8% |
| 3Y | +108.2% | +102.4% | +5.7% | +57.1% |
| All | +108.2% | +101.0% | +7.2% | +57.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling