+228.0%
UMC vs FIGR
+6.3%
+221.7%
-37.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | FIGR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.1% | +6.4% | -1.4% | +4.6% |
| 7D | +6.6% | +13.5% | -7.0% | +5.6% |
| 30D | +16.6% | +33.7% | -17.1% | +13.8% |
| 3M | +11.0% | +37.3% | -26.3% | +8.3% |
| 6M | +131.3% | +25.5% | +105.7% | +127.0% |
| YTD | +182.5% | -6.3% | +188.8% | +177.6% |
| All | +228.0% | +6.3% | +221.7% | +220.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FIGR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FIGR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FIGR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FIGR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling