+212.3%
UMC vs FBTC
+62.5%
+149.9%
-37.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | FBTC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.1% | -1.7% | +6.8% | +5.3% |
| 7D | +6.6% | +1.5% | +5.0% | +6.3% |
| 30D | +16.6% | +20.7% | -4.1% | +13.6% |
| 3M | +11.0% | +23.7% | -12.6% | +7.9% |
| 6M | +131.3% | +15.0% | +116.3% | +126.9% |
| YTD | +182.5% | -10.5% | +193.0% | +182.3% |
| 1Y | +222.3% | -30.3% | +252.5% | +230.6% |
| All | +212.3% | +62.5% | +149.9% | +195.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FBTC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FBTC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FBTC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FBTC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling