+262.2%
UMC vs FANG
+45.3%
+216.9%
-37.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FANG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.4% | -0.2% | +2.6% | +2.4% |
| 7D | +9.0% | +2.9% | +6.1% | +8.6% |
| 30D | +17.2% | +2.6% | +14.6% | +16.7% |
| 3M | +11.4% | +7.6% | +3.8% | +10.1% |
| 6M | +137.5% | +17.3% | +120.2% | +128.3% |
| YTD | +193.1% | +38.7% | +154.4% | +171.2% |
| 1Y | +240.3% | +51.6% | +188.7% | +207.1% |
| 3Y | +262.2% | +50.0% | +212.2% | +224.8% |
| All | +262.2% | +45.3% | +216.9% | +224.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FANG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FANG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FANG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FANG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling