+108.2%
UMC vs EXPD
+68.8%
+39.3%
-51.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EXPD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.5% | -2.3% | +5.8% | +4.0% |
| 7D | -17.0% | -7.2% | -9.8% | -15.5% |
| 30D | -40.6% | -3.3% | -37.3% | -40.0% |
| 3M | -27.9% | +3.4% | -31.3% | -28.1% |
| 6M | -7.5% | +22.7% | -30.2% | -10.5% |
| YTD | +79.3% | +24.5% | +54.8% | +70.9% |
| 1Y | +92.8% | +38.6% | +54.2% | +78.8% |
| 3Y | +108.2% | +71.5% | +36.7% | +76.4% |
| All | +108.2% | +68.8% | +39.3% | +76.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EXPD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EXPD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EXPD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EXPD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling