+222.3%
UMC vs DOCS
+9.5%
+212.9%
-37.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | DOCS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.6% | -2.8% | +7.3% | +4.7% |
| 7D | +5.0% | -1.4% | +6.4% | +5.0% |
| 30D | +7.7% | +21.8% | -14.1% | +6.8% |
| 3M | +1.7% | +27.3% | -25.6% | +0.5% |
| 6M | +113.9% | -0.3% | +114.3% | +114.2% |
| YTD | +168.9% | -40.5% | +209.4% | +179.7% |
| 1Y | +207.2% | -61.5% | +268.7% | +230.5% |
| All | +222.3% | +9.5% | +212.9% | +202.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DOCS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DOCS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DOCS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DOCS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling