+240.3%
UMC vs CTAS
+1.1%
+239.2%
-37.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | CTAS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.4% | +1.5% | +0.8% | +3.0% |
| 7D | +9.0% | +0.5% | +8.5% | +9.2% |
| 30D | +17.2% | -0.7% | +18.0% | +17.0% |
| 3M | +11.4% | +11.1% | +0.3% | +15.3% |
| 6M | +137.5% | +2.1% | +135.4% | +149.1% |
| YTD | +193.1% | +8.0% | +185.1% | +206.2% |
| 1Y | +240.3% | -0.5% | +240.8% | +266.8% |
| All | +240.3% | +1.1% | +239.2% | +266.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CTAS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CTAS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CTAS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CTAS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling