+124.3%
UMC vs CI
+11.1%
+113.2%
-51.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | CI | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.0% | +2.5% | -1.5% | +1.3% |
| 7D | -8.3% | +2.6% | -10.9% | -8.0% |
| 30D | -34.5% | +7.3% | -41.8% | -34.0% |
| 3M | -20.0% | +9.5% | -29.4% | -19.2% |
| 6M | -0.7% | +6.4% | -7.2% | +0.2% |
| YTD | +94.7% | +12.0% | +82.7% | +96.7% |
| 1Y | +106.0% | +20.1% | +85.9% | +107.9% |
| 3Y | +124.3% | +9.6% | +114.7% | +123.8% |
| All | +124.3% | +11.1% | +113.2% | +123.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CI.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CI return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CI return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CI wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling