+262.2%
UMC vs AEM
+339.2%
-77.0%
-37.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | AEM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.4% | +1.9% | +0.5% | +2.0% |
| 7D | +9.0% | -2.1% | +11.1% | +9.5% |
| 30D | +17.2% | +8.4% | +8.8% | +14.8% |
| 3M | +11.4% | +27.3% | -15.9% | +4.5% |
| 6M | +137.5% | -9.7% | +147.2% | +138.8% |
| YTD | +193.1% | +19.0% | +174.2% | +180.3% |
| 1Y | +240.3% | +31.5% | +208.8% | +218.6% |
| 3Y | +262.2% | +338.7% | -76.5% | +165.3% |
| All | +262.2% | +339.2% | -77.0% | +165.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AEM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AEM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AEM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AEM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling