+116.7%
UMAC vs CLBK
+68.0%
+48.7%
-52.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | CLBK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.5% | -0.1% | -2.4% | -2.4% |
| 7D | -3.4% | -1.5% | -2.0% | -2.9% |
| 30D | -15.1% | -1.0% | -14.1% | -14.6% |
| 3M | -10.8% | +22.9% | -33.7% | -15.9% |
| 6M | +15.7% | +44.2% | -28.5% | +5.6% |
| YTD | +80.1% | +64.0% | +16.2% | +56.3% |
| 1Y | +116.7% | +65.7% | +51.0% | +74.0% |
| All | +116.7% | +68.0% | +48.7% | +74.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CLBK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CLBK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CLBK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CLBK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling