+85.0%
UBER vs NIO
-90.7%
+175.7%
-57.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.3% | -1.6% | +1.3% | +0.1% |
| 7D | -3.9% | -13.0% | +9.2% | -1.2% |
| 30D | +11.1% | -18.3% | +29.4% | +15.7% |
| 3M | +4.9% | -33.2% | +38.1% | +13.5% |
| 6M | -1.2% | -21.5% | +20.3% | +1.9% |
| YTD | -7.3% | -25.5% | +18.2% | -3.8% |
| 1Y | -17.6% | -38.0% | +20.4% | -12.1% |
| 3Y | +61.1% | -65.5% | +126.5% | +82.8% |
| All | +85.0% | -90.7% | +175.7% | +171.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling